October 16, 1999

Another letter from the ex about that expense- she will “forward the copy of the receipt today for the last lenses replacement. The cost was only $50.00 probably because we just bought lenses.”



Sent N’s cd on 10/8. The package was delivered 10/12 at 2:26 pm.

Sometimes sending things to the kids takes 2 days, sometimes longer. I guess it depends on the mail volume. Weird, but it is what it is.

October 12, 1999

9 days later….9 days…. Keith gets this letter today from the ex. Right off the bat, “(daughter) lost one of her contact lenses.” She says the replacement won’t be paid by any insurance company and the out of pocket expense for it is $75.00 and she “Your prompt payment for half of this will be appreciated.” Can you believe that shit?!

October 3, 1999

A letter this time from the ex. Apparently she isn’t happy again…SHOCKING.

Between August 1999 and this date, the ex has been emailing or writing letters to Keith about a Vision bill and provider. I wasn’t mentioned in any of them until today. The ex wrote that at an appointment for their daughter, she was told “within ear shot” of their daughter about a conversation he had with the Doctor. The ex said she had also been sent a copy of a letter Keith wrote the doctor’s office. She said she and her daughter were “both quite embarrassed to find out what you and your wife have been doing.”

What have we been doing? Interesting. She went on to say “Because of your harassment and your insurance company this has caused an inconvenience to me and to your children…Please be advised that I don’t want any harassing response from you regarding this. I will seek an attorney and file a restraining order.”

REALLY? BRING IT….she won’t. She threatens this shit all the time and has never brought a restraining order against either of us. On what grounds? That SHE isn’t using the insurance properly therefore causing the insurance problems herself because she’s not using providers contracted with our insurance company? Bring it!

According to the FL-192- Notice of Rights and Responsibilities #7 says that if there is a designated healthcare provider, that provider must be used at all times, and if they aren’t, then the expense that would have been paid by the preferred health care provider will be the “SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PARTY INCURRING THOSE COSTS.” CHECK IT OUT. https://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/fl192.pdf