Category: Uncategorized

So, oldest stepdaughter emails Keith tonight at 1925, and tells him how she is “shocked….COMPLETELY SHOCKED” to hear that his relationship with her younger siblings had suffered the last few years. She also told him that his ex, her former stepmother, had written her a letter last September (2004) letting her know how to contact her younger siblings. She said, “don’t worry, there was NOTHING written about you)” She admits to Keith that she felt saddened that she let hers and Keith’s relationship “or the lack thereof” affect her relationship with them.

Keith wrote her back at 2122 and gave her the breakdown of what’s been happening, and recalling how his ex felt about her, and the problems he had when he was married to his ex and the problems she caused when it was time to see his oldest daughter and son for visitation. He told her how the ex blamed me for her second divorce, as did his younger daughter and how she, the ex, told me that she would be on my door step and I had better be afraid.

She and Keith had been emailing about her engagement party and wedding plans, and how they’ve locked in the date of “October 16, 2005, sunset wedding in Newport Beach.”

This evvening though, at 2058, she emails Keith about how she “had no idea” that he hasn’t had a relationship with his two middle kids “as well…and for sooo long?!?!?!?! Whats up with that?!!!!!!”

He was taken aback by her email. He emailed her back at 2118 saying that he had no idea, and asked where she heard that from. He wrote, “Did you talk to them? Last time I saw (middle stepdaughter) was December 2002. all was well. I was supposed to see her in Spring 2003, and she decided not to come because her mother took me back to court. I was then ready and set to see her in the summer, and the last time I talked to her, days before she was to come out, she screamed on the phone at me, and didn’t come out. (Middle stepson name), I couldn’t tell ya. I got two birthday cards from him in 2003, and he refused my birthday cards to him in 2004. If you know more, let me know. Dad”

Sent this back to the Court house. Keith’s signed for the OSC, as “Paris Hilton” on 2/25/2005. It was delivered to the court today, 3/4/05, my birthday, LOL.

I included a copy of the postal form 3811, showing how she signed for the OSC as “Paris Hilton”

Today, Keith’s employer was notified that his daughter will be 18 in June and that child support needs to cease upon her birth date. His employer was provided a copy of her birth certificate and proof of graduation at her school as well as a copy of an email from his ex stating the date of graduation from back in November 2004.

So, check out who signed the OSC the ex received the other day….Funny, It’s the ex’s print and handwriting

Lies, Lies Lies, to the bitter end…she signed this on 2/27/05-

1. Background- ex declares under penalty of perjury mind you, that she has a wage garnishment in effect since April 1991 due to no child support payments voluntarily made from Keith. (LIE) She alleges that Keith became past due in support payments and made no effort to pay outside of a wage garnishment. (LIE)

2. Ex further alleges that Keith has changed his in what was owed to her and is now pursuing the change in wage garnishment. (LIE) She goes on to say that if he changes the arrearages he will still owe her $289.59 at his daughters 18th birthday. (LIE)

3. She states that is has been living in WA state since March of 1993. (LIE) She says that due to “timing of the court date with responsibilities at work, no time allowed by employer. the distance for travel and the care of their daughter, she is unable to appear at this court on this date. (Interesting….) She goes on to say that should the court award for Respondent due to her absence, please consider her declaration and the reason for her absence. She ends with “I am in agreement to stop this order for arrearages in the amount of $50.00 when our daughter reaches age 18 on June 2005.” She copied the front of the envelope that she received her court papers from and told the court, “I was served the court papers by Richard (last name) himself through the US Postal system.”

IRONICALLY, the proof of Service by mail SHE made a copy of says and sent to Keith said it was sent by her ex husband. Gave his address of residence or business as a strip mall. Ironically, the address listed also includes a grocery story that HER employer is located at. When her ex husband printed his name, it’s her writing and when her ex husband signs the proof of service, it’s her signature. ALL under a declaration under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of CA.

Go figure.

Ex received the OSC today. She picked it up at 11:35am.

https://simasgovlaw.com/declaratory-relief/

Keith filed an OSC today. He gave background information in his declaration. He also let the court know that his attempt to contact the mother on 2/22/2005 to obtain her agreement that that his arrears obligation was satisfied, failed. She stated she would not agree until their daughter turned 18, (which is in June 2005) at which time his ongoing support will also terminate. Keith declared: 1. Background- I am the father of the minor (17) involved in this matter. The mother and I divorced in 1990. The most recent order on child support was filed 9/26/03 and provides that I pay the mother $560 per month child support retroactive to 12/1/02, plus $50 per month commencing 6/1/03, towards any arrears created by this order. A wage assignment was filed that same date. The stipulated order does not set an exact amount for the arrearage payment, nor does the wage assignment order.

Effective 2/25/05, I will have paid the last arrearage payment. I am seeking to modify the wage assignment to terminate this portion of my obligation. My attempt to contact the mother on 2/22/05, to obtain her agreement that my arrears obligation was satisfied, failed. She indicated she would not agree until our daughter turned 18 (which is in June ’05, at which time my ongoing support obligation will also terminate. )

2. ARREARS: I request a court order declaring that my arrears obligation is -0- and modifying the wage assignment to reflect this. See Ex. A attached for verification. I was current on my support obligation prior to the stipulated order. The arrears was only created because of the retroactivity of the order. I was initially paying child support of $700 per month for 2 children. The support obligation reduced to $350 per month in Sept. ’02 when our eldest turned 18 (and had graduated). In Nov. ’02, the mother filed an OSC to increase support for our youngest, which led to the stipulated order of $560 retroactive to December ’02 (with retroactive portion payable at $50 per month). We entered into this stipulation in May/June ’03, although it was not filed until Sept. ’03. I began payments as required by the order immediately. Payments were made by wage assignment and by direct payment for amounts not covered by the assignment.

I sent this OSC to her today from El Cajon. I sent it Certified/Return Receipt.

It took 10 years, LOL, but uncovered medical expense arrears have now been addressed. Child support went down to $607 a month support.

THANK YOU.

Hilarious that the ex thinks Keith should pay BEFORE anything, before she gets her support checks, before the insurance companies process claims, etc.

Today, Keith received a letter from his ex, that is dated January 18, 2005, and with it, she attached HER perceived final amounts and “estimated” amounts of child support she thinks he would owe her.

Their daughter turns 18 this year in June, so I guess the ex is trying to “wrap up” whatever it is she’s trying to “wrap up.” The ex also told Keith to not contact her regarding this letter “or any further complaints or harassment directed toward me by you and your wife.” She told him she no longer has an attorney on retainer and she no longer uses the services of her previous attorney, based out of San Diego.

She said, her personal information is private – that forwarding or otherwise directly sending correspondence or other information to other parties that she has not authorized is a violation of her privacy rights. GEEZ, if I had a nickel for every time she used that phrase. She went on to tell him that she “is seeking the professional services of an local attorney to file charges of harassment due to the continued berating content of e-mails (which I have deleted and blocked all addresses and alias by Richard (our last name) and his wife Patricia) and the violation of my privacy rights. I have refused and will continue to refuse all mail and any other correspondence to the nature and content of these mailings.”

She told him that the amount owed to her for child support for the benefit and welfare of (formal name Daughter) date of birth 6/18/1987, ( as if Keith didn’t know) is due monthly and has been court ordered to her that was since 1989. UM, that would be a lie. He LEFT in 1989, and there was NO court order for support until November 1990. Prior to that, he paid on his own, with her acknowledging his payments and even told him “thank you for sending money on time and regularly.” She then went on to accuse him of never being able to meet that court ordered requirement. Well, truth be told, there WAS no court ordered requirement at that time, LOL. She whines that she continues to receive less than the court ordered amount from his employer by garnishment. She states court ordered amounts are not what she is receiving resulting in arrearages and past due child support. She tells him, “this is not my problem.” He never said it was. She says this is his responsibility to pay his child support on time and in full each month.

She then tell him, “Should you wish to make the payment owed in fill or make payments before the end of June 2005, you may do so directly to my checking account at (lists her banking name and address) in my name (her first and last name which she has changed back to her maiden name)or to our daughter (daughters first and last name.)She is at the same post office and is able to pick up the mail each day.”

These last two paragraphs made us laugh. She wrote, “Five months until June 18, 2005 and the end of your responsibility to support your daughter. I NO longer wish to have any contact with you. If you need something talk to your children not me. Failure to pay your child support in full by June 18, 2005 will result in filing a statement with the State of California Department of Child Services. (she typed her first name and then signed it).

Huh? I’m thinking she means the Dept of Child Support Services. She tries to sound so smug and smart.