~This Is My World~

Keith sent his ex and the court a letter, telling the court that he believes perjury has been committed by his former wife, and named her. He writes:

“Ms. (her maiden name now) declares under penalty of perjury that I served her myself, through the USPS. This is false. My wife is the one that took it into the Post office in El Cajon and paid for the postage. When Ms. (maiden name) signed for the OSC she was served with, she signed her name as “Paris Hilton.” On March 23. 2005, Ms. (Maiden name) denies doing this and told me to “prove it.” Providing a copy of other “printed material” from Ms. (Maiden name) will prove she did sign and print her name as Paris Hilton. One thing that Ms (Maiden name) fails to state is that she was also served by Personal Service on March 3, 2005 by Deputy (First and last name) of (local sheriff’s) Dept in (City) in WA. The Proof of Service by mail that Ms (maiden name) sent me a copy of and sent the court as well, is perjured and forged.

It is declared under penalty of perjury that (first, MI, last name), Ms. (Maiden name)’s former husband deposited the sealed envelope with the USPS with the postage fully prepaid. The truth is, not only is it Ms (maiden name)’s writing on the envelope, it is she that actually dated the form, wrote, (her ex husbands first name MI, last name) and it is she that actually signed the form as (her ex’s first name, MI, last name ll). It seems Ms. (maiden now) did not remember that (her ex husband) had signed for two other pieces of mail, in the the past that I had mailed Ms (maiden name) when they were married.

In item one of Ms (maiden name)’s declaration, she states that she had had a wage garnishment in effect since April 1991 due to no child support payments voluntarily made from me. The truth is, prior to our divorce, between May 1989 and August 1989, I paid Ms (maiden name) $6000.00. She also paid herself and additional #3121.04 from my business account ($2946.04 by check made out to herself and $175.00 made out for cash, and signed by her.)

I have letters from Ms (Maiden name) in June and September 1990 thanking me for sending her money on time and regularly and telling me that she was on welfare and did not put the money I gave her into a Revenue and Recovery account like Welfare asked her to do. Our divorce was final Nov 29, 1990 and I was ordered to pay $400 month. In January 1991, I drove down to San Diego and paid (ex’s first name)$1000.00 cash. In February 1991, I paid Ms (maiden name) $240.00 cash. She said it would be easier if she got a wage garnishment. I didn’t agree with it, but a wage garnishment order was filed anyway. Ms (maiden name) did not claim the $1000.00 I paid her in January, but claimed the $240.00 I paid her in February, and her attorney at the time, (attorney’s name) got a garnishment which included$1360.00 in arrearages for Nov. 1990 ($400), Dec 90 ($400), Jan. 91 ($400) and partial Feb 91 ($160). The garnishment was effective March 12, 1991.

In item two of Ms (maiden name)’s declaration, Ms (maiden name) states that I will owe her $289.59. This is absolutely false. The fact is, right at this time, I am over paid in arrearages. Ms (maiden name) will be getting her final child support check from me on July 1, 2005 for $258.46 and she will be over paid in child support $86.14.

In item three of Ms (maiden name)’s declaration, she says she has been living in WA state since March 1993. attached is a letter from Ms (maiden name) to my employer, specifically saying effective 2-12-93, her new address is now (lists address). Ms (maiden name) further declares that she is unable to make it to court at this time on this date, and lists several reasons. My income in necessary to support not only my daughter but my 2 other minor children with my current wife, and I too have responsibilities at work and had to request this day off from work, from my employer and I have to drive 2-3 hours one way to be here for Court, and I am here. On March 22, 2005, Ms (maiden name) told me in an email that she will be at court.

I request that the Court consider all Ms (maiden name)’s perjured declaration and order the arrearage garnishment of $50.00 a month to stop, effective immediately, and that Ms (maiden name) be ordered to reimbursement me any and all over payments of child support and arrearage garnishment prior July 1, 2005, by money order or cashiers check, payable to myself (states name and address). I request that the Court specify the actual amount of overpaid arrearages and child support due me, so there will be no question or hassle from Ms (maiden name). This request is necessary as Ms. (maiden name) has told me as of today, there are only 85 days left until I can no longer contact her and that as of June 17, 2005 at 12:00 midnight I will no longer have any right to contact her home or her.

Thank you for your time and consideration. (FULL legal name) CC: (Ex’s first, middle and all 3 last names she’s been known as.) “

Keith provided copies of proof of everything he claimed in this letter. He sent a copy to his ex, delivery confirmation.

Today, March 24, 2005 at 0807am, the ex emailed Keith. Seems she’s had a change of heart about emails and letters. LOL…She’s on a count down. She’s hilarious! She wrote, “Only 85 days left- till you no longer can contact me- as of June 17, 2005 at 12:00 midnight- you will no longer have any rights to contact my home or me.

Doesn’t “12:00 midnight” constitute a new day?

Keith wrote his oldest daughter back. Actually, he emailed her back. He apologized if he offended her but told her that when it comes to the subject of his middle kids, it’s a sensitive subject for me and he does get defensive about it basically because he knows what he’s done and hasn’t done. He also told his daughter that he hasn’t lied to her or his middle kids, and he hopes, “Lord willing” that his relationship with his middle kids will come back around in the future and that he and this daughter can spend more time together than they have.

She wrote Keith earlier this afternoon. She told him that his lasts email was a lot of information to digest. She told him that his ex wife’s email to her did not say anything about his relationship with his middle two kids, that the letter’s purpose, “it seems” was to get her half brother and half sisters information to her. His ex told her that she “had to research” her information to contact her. His daughter said she also “believes this same letter was sent to other family members.”

His daughter goes on to say, “Yes, there have been a lot of problems with you and (ex wife’s name) and unfortunately it has affected your relationship with (son and daughter)….but I’m not taking her side…its unfortunate that ALL of this has trickled into (her half siblings) heart. The only thing I know is what (half sister) has shared with me.”

Very telling to Keith and I.

So, oldest stepdaughter emails Keith tonight at 1925, and tells him how she is “shocked….COMPLETELY SHOCKED” to hear that his relationship with her younger siblings had suffered the last few years. She also told him that his ex, her former stepmother, had written her a letter last September (2004) letting her know how to contact her younger siblings. She said, “don’t worry, there was NOTHING written about you)” She admits to Keith that she felt saddened that she let hers and Keith’s relationship “or the lack thereof” affect her relationship with them.

Keith wrote her back at 2122 and gave her the breakdown of what’s been happening, and recalling how his ex felt about her, and the problems he had when he was married to his ex and the problems she caused when it was time to see his oldest daughter and son for visitation. He told her how the ex blamed me for her second divorce, as did his younger daughter and how she, the ex, told me that she would be on my door step and I had better be afraid.

She and Keith had been emailing about her engagement party and wedding plans, and how they’ve locked in the date of “October 16, 2005, sunset wedding in Newport Beach.”

This evvening though, at 2058, she emails Keith about how she “had no idea” that he hasn’t had a relationship with his two middle kids “as well…and for sooo long?!?!?!?! Whats up with that?!!!!!!”

He was taken aback by her email. He emailed her back at 2118 saying that he had no idea, and asked where she heard that from. He wrote, “Did you talk to them? Last time I saw (middle stepdaughter) was December 2002. all was well. I was supposed to see her in Spring 2003, and she decided not to come because her mother took me back to court. I was then ready and set to see her in the summer, and the last time I talked to her, days before she was to come out, she screamed on the phone at me, and didn’t come out. (Middle stepson name), I couldn’t tell ya. I got two birthday cards from him in 2003, and he refused my birthday cards to him in 2004. If you know more, let me know. Dad”

Sent this back to the Court house. Keith’s signed for the OSC, as “Paris Hilton” on 2/25/2005. It was delivered to the court today, 3/4/05, my birthday, LOL.

I included a copy of the postal form 3811, showing how she signed for the OSC as “Paris Hilton”

Today, Keith’s employer was notified that his daughter will be 18 in June and that child support needs to cease upon her birth date. His employer was provided a copy of her birth certificate and proof of graduation at her school as well as a copy of an email from his ex stating the date of graduation from back in November 2004.

So, check out who signed the OSC the ex received the other day….Funny, It’s the ex’s print and handwriting

Lies, Lies Lies, to the bitter end…she signed this on 2/27/05-

1. Background- ex declares under penalty of perjury mind you, that she has a wage garnishment in effect since April 1991 due to no child support payments voluntarily made from Keith. (LIE) She alleges that Keith became past due in support payments and made no effort to pay outside of a wage garnishment. (LIE)

2. Ex further alleges that Keith has changed his in what was owed to her and is now pursuing the change in wage garnishment. (LIE) She goes on to say that if he changes the arrearages he will still owe her $289.59 at his daughters 18th birthday. (LIE)

3. She states that is has been living in WA state since March of 1993. (LIE) She says that due to “timing of the court date with responsibilities at work, no time allowed by employer. the distance for travel and the care of their daughter, she is unable to appear at this court on this date. (Interesting….) She goes on to say that should the court award for Respondent due to her absence, please consider her declaration and the reason for her absence. She ends with “I am in agreement to stop this order for arrearages in the amount of $50.00 when our daughter reaches age 18 on June 2005.” She copied the front of the envelope that she received her court papers from and told the court, “I was served the court papers by Richard (last name) himself through the US Postal system.”

IRONICALLY, the proof of Service by mail SHE made a copy of says and sent to Keith said it was sent by her ex husband. Gave his address of residence or business as a strip mall. Ironically, the address listed also includes a grocery story that HER employer is located at. When her ex husband printed his name, it’s her writing and when her ex husband signs the proof of service, it’s her signature. ALL under a declaration under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of CA.

Go figure.